NCOP blocks Western Cape govt's plan to dissolve Knysna Municipality. Image credit: Supplied/Knysna Municipality
(The Post News) – Parliament has rejected the Western Cape government’s plan to dissolve the Knysna Municipality, a decision that has sparked debate about the balance of power between provincial authorities and local democratic processes in South Africa.
On Friday, the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) dismissed the proposal, arguing that it would compromise the democratic rights of residents and create a concerning precedent for the management of distressed municipalities by provincial governments.
The provincial government defended its strategy by pointing to years of administrative shortcomings in Knysna. Authorities cited ongoing financial mismanagement, deteriorating service delivery, and instability within the council. The Western Cape government stated that disbanding the municipality and installing an administrator was the “sole feasible solution” to reestablish effective governance.
Provincial representatives contended that citizens had been disappointed multiple times and that strong action was essential to restore order and responsibility to the coastal community.
Reasons Parliament Rejected
Parliamentarians resisted, arguing that the choice to oust elected councillors would take away residents’ democratic representation. NCOP members contended that although Knysna’s issues are significant, the solution should not undermine democracy.
One MP said in the chamber: “Democracy cannot be erased due to inadequate performance.” Communities chose their leaders, and they should have the opportunity to make them accountable via governance reforms, rather than through replacements.
The NCOP emphasized that provincial assistance should prioritize support and supervision, instead of undermining the power of elected officials.
In Knysna, opinions were varied. Certain residents applauded Parliament’s choice, expressing that it safeguards their right to representation and prevents the dangers of external interference. For some, irritation peaked, with
About the Author
