Opposition leaders at the African Peace and Security Dialogue emphasize the urgency of African-led solutions for the ongoing DRC crisis. Image: The Guardian.
(The Post News)– The African Peace and Security Dialogue commenced in South Africa this week, drawing attention from across the continent for its critical focus on peace in conflict zones, particularly in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). However, the dialogue has already sparked controversy, as prominent opposition leaders from the DRC accused their government of actively preventing them from attending.
The dialogue, spearheaded by the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, seeks to provide a platform for African-led solutions to the continent’s pressing conflicts. But in the case of the DRC, opposition figures argue that their government has deliberately restricted their participation.
DRC Opposition Leaders Accuse Government of Travel Blocks
Prominent Congolese opposition leaders who were invited to the African Peace and Security Dialogue have publicly blamed the DRC government for obstructing their travel. Jean-Claude Kibala, the leader of the Social Movement for Renewal party, revealed that immigration officials confiscated his passport without explanation.
Another opposition figure, Jean-Marc Kabund, claimed that the government denied him a visa on direct orders. Former Prime Minister Matata Ponyo, who now leads an opposition party, also confirmed that his members were unable to secure passports to attend the dialogue, which began on Wednesday in South Africa.
Congolese authorities have yet to officially respond to these allegations. However, President Felix Tshisekedi recently reiterated that he will only endorse dialogues brokered by foreign powers such as the United States and Qatar and will not recognize initiatives outside his administration’s control.
Thabo Mbeki’s Initiative Faces Controversy
The Thabo Mbeki Peace Initiative is central to the dialogue’s goals, aiming to facilitate homegrown solutions to African conflicts. However, some senior government officials in Kinshasa have described the dialogue as an informal meeting serving foreign interests. The DRC government’s position stems partly from mistrust of Mbeki, who has previously been critical of South African military deployment to eastern DRC in 2023.
This skepticism has fueled tensions, as the dialogue coincides with ongoing conflicts in eastern DRC. The M23 rebel group, which claims to represent marginalized communities in the region, has confirmed its participation in the dialogue, further complicating relations between the DRC government and the opposition.
Opposition Leaders Speak Out
At the dialogue, opposition leaders made strong statements about the dire situation in eastern DRC. One of the participants emphasized the necessity of African-led solutions and criticized President Tshisekedi’s refusal to engage in non-US or Qatar-brokered dialogues.
According to a representative, indeed, peace and security are crucial themes in this dialogue, particularly regarding the current situation in the eastern part of the DRC. This topic serves as a focal point for numerous delegations from various regions of Africa. Moreover, the focus is on ensuring that Africa can manage these hotspots, ranging from the current situation in Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado to events in Goma in eastern DRC.
The opposition also expressed gratitude for Mbeki’s initiative, stating that indeed, peace and security are crucial themes in this dialogue, particularly regarding the current situation in the eastern part of the DRC. They said this topic serves as a focal point for numerous delegations from various regions of Africa. According to them, the focus is on ensuring that Africa can manage these hotspots, ranging from the current situation in Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado to events in Goma in eastern DRC.
Accusations of Government Bias
Despite Mbeki’s facilitation of the dialogue, some opposition figures accused him of not maintaining neutrality. They voiced disappointment that President Tshisekedi refused to participate, saying that it is a sign that he “wants war,” as he has previously declared.
Delegates at the African Peace and Security Dialogue highlighted ongoing violence in eastern DRC, which continues to threaten civilian populations. A participant described the intensity of government-led operations against civilians: “The current situation, as we speak at the moment, is that there is a drone, CH-4, of DRC coalition forces that are attacking the civilian population in Minimwe. As we speak. In Uvira, where there’s an HQ, they’re coordinating an attack against all civilians in a densely populated area.”
Goals of the African Peace and Security Dialogue
The dialogue, under the Thabo Mbeki Peace Initiative, aims to facilitate a forum where African leaders and stakeholders can engage in open discussions about conflict resolution. Its purpose is not merely to negotiate but to generate sustainable frameworks for peace that can be implemented with local support.
By including opposition groups and other stakeholders, the initiative seeks to ensure that African solutions are rooted in the realities of affected regions rather than imposed externally. This approach resonates with leaders who argue that foreign interventions have often exacerbated conflicts on the continent.
M23 Rebel Participation Adds Complexity
The presence of M23 delegates at the dialogue further complicates the scenario. While the group claims to represent marginalized communities, the DRC government views them as a destabilizing force. Opposition leaders argued that including such groups in discussions is essential to achieving comprehensive peace: “So everybody discussing peace and security for DRC, we are there. So, this is why we are here; our presence is here,” one participant emphasized.
The Call for African-Led Solutions
Central to the Thabo Mbeki Peace Initiative is the belief that Africa must solve its conflicts independently, without undue reliance on external powers. Participants emphasized that initiatives like this dialogue are crucial to creating homegrown solutions that address the root causes of conflict:
The DRC Opposition Crisis exposed by the African Peace and Security Dialogue demonstrates the complexities of achieving peace in conflict zones. Government restrictions on opposition participation, ongoing violence in eastern DRC, and the presence of armed groups like M23 underscore the need for inclusive, African-led solutions.
The dialogue, facilitated by the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, provides a rare opportunity for stakeholders to engage constructively. By incorporating voices from all sides, including opposition figures and rebel groups, the initiative hopes to develop sustainable frameworks for peace that prioritize civilian protection and long-term stability.
As the African Peace and Security Dialogue continues, it remains a litmus test for the region’s capacity to resolve its conflicts through dialogue, diplomacy, and cooperation rather than exclusion and force.
About the Author
