Petty cash misuse leads to dismissal after employee buys chocolates with company funds. Image credit: c7.alamy.com
(The Post News) – Petty cash misuse became the focus of a dismissal case that began with just two chocolate bars. A sales manager was fired after using company petty cash for personal purchases, and what appeared minor at first quickly escalated into a legal battle that reached the Labour Court in Johannesburg.
At the start, the dispute was heard in arbitration. The commissioner ordered reinstatement, accepting the employee’s explanation that she acted without bad intent. However, the employer, JDG Ltd trading as Hi Fi Corporation, strongly disagreed. Consequently, the company turned to the Labour Court, arguing that the act of petty cash misuse damaged workplace trust beyond repair.
Petty Cash Misuse During Store Promotion
The employee had been assigned to buy stationery for a promotional campaign at the Jabulani Mall branch. On two different occasions, she withdrew petty cash for this purpose. Alongside the stationery, she also added two chocolates for her own use. Because she failed to disclose this to her manager, the shortfall later raised concerns during petty cash reconciliation.
As soon as the branch manager noticed the shortage, he confronted her. Although she admitted to the purchase, she did not have a plan to repay the funds. Therefore, a disciplinary hearing was scheduled. After reviewing the facts, the chairperson recommended dismissal, which was carried out. This became another example of petty cash misuse leading to an employee’s termination after breaching company policy.
Petty Cash Misuse Confirmed in Labour Court
Even though the employee had submitted receipts, the company argued that honesty was still compromised. From their perspective, had the receipts not been checked, the personal spending might never have come to light. As a result, they argued that the trust relationship had been permanently broken.
The Labour Court agreed with this position. Acting Judge C de Kock explained that using company money for personal purposes no matter how small amounted to dishonesty. Furthermore, he found it unreasonable to treat the act as excusable, since the employee never disclosed the purchases in advance. With trust destroyed, reinstatement was not an option, and the dismissal was upheld.
In the end, what began with two chocolate bars ended with a career setback. This case demonstrates that once integrity is questioned, consequences can be severe. Ultimately, petty cash misuse is less about the amount involved and more about the principle of accountability.
Please share your thoughts contact Thembeka via email: Journalist-thembeka@thepostnews.net
About the Author
